Get a mentor, not a critic.
The dictionary definition of a mentor is “an experienced and trusted advisor,” or “leader, tutor or coach.” The definition of a critic sounds similar, “a person who offers reasoned judgment or analysis.” The big difference, of course, is that a mentor looks ahead to help you, while a critic looks backward to tell you what you did wrong.
We can all learn from both of these approaches, but in my view the mentor is far more valuable than a critic. A mentor’s goal is to help you build your strengths to avoid problems and pitfalls, while a critic feels compelled to point out your weaknesses.
The job of entrepreneur is tough enough without a critic on your team, second-guessing your every move. Here are some tips on how to recognize whether a partner, consultant, or employee is a mentor or a critic:
1. Earns your absolute trust. One of the key characteristics of a successful mentor relationship is trust. You should be easily convinced by actions and attitude that the mentor candidate has your best interests at heart.
2. Mutual respect. You and your mentor must have total respect for each other and show professional courtesy toward each other. A critic is more inclined to offer advice through cynical witticisms, whether they consider you a peer, boss, or employee.
3. Able to communicate directly. Your mentor must be able to clearly communicate his/her expectations and boundaries consistently, whether face-to-face or via email. Critics often prefer to deliver their message to your friends and peers.
4. Similar ethics. You and your mentor should adhere to the same ethical rules, as defined by your business and government community. You will be uncomfortable with critics whose ethical positions are not clear, or vary widely from yours.
5. Long-term relationship potential. Mentors play important roles in the careers of most successful entrepreneurs. The relationships with good current mentors likely will continue and often grow into strong friendships. Most people cannot tolerate a long-term relationship with their critic.
But try as you might to avoid them, we all have to deal with critics and the criticism they offer. Everyone reacts differently to criticism. Here are some tips on how to avoid any extreme reactions to criticism, like confrontations and angry debates:
• Don’t take it personally. One reason people get angry at being criticized is that they take the criticism as a personal attack, rather than a comment on performance. Or they think the person criticizing them is trying to ridicule them. This is not always true.
• Take suggestions from anyone. Sometimes people get angry when they are criticized by others who are younger or older, or not familiar with the subject. That’s a bad move. Commit yourself to always looking only at the content and not who is offering it.
• Don’t reply immediately. Don’t push to reply to a criticism in progress. Allow the point to be made completely, then think a moment before you start any response. First find an agreement portion, ending with points you do not agree on.
• Smile and don’t get angry. It always helps to smile when you are being criticized. This will help you create a non-confrontational debate and shows that you are confident in what you think.
Most critics I know think they are mentors, but I’ve never known a good mentor who is easily mistaken for a critic. If you listen to yourself, you can tell the difference. Are you asking forward-looking questions, or making negative assessments about past events? It’s hard to be a leader if you are always looking backward.
All opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of Gust.
Written by Martin Zwilling
You might also be interested in
Steve Jobs was one of those entrepreneurs who seemed universally either loved or hated, but not many will argue with his ability to innovate in the technology product arena over the years. He was instrumental in creating Apple, which has pioneered a dazzling array of new products, and even surpassed Microsoft, to become the
There is a saying in the not-for-profit world that your board members should all fall into one or more of three categories in which they can deliver: Wealth, Work or Wisdom.
In my experience, those same qualities also apply to for-profit boards:
Wealth, as in investors who can write checks and help with fundraising in future rounds;
Work, as in directors with specific
There is no such thing as a full-time angel investor (or if there is, I’ve never met one.)
If you mean someone investing mostly other people’s money through a seed fund, they are venture capitalists, and their days are spent like other VCs, meeting with prospective investments, mentoring portfolio companies, raising money from limited partners, negotiating deals, and so forth.
If you mean
Back from a hiatus, it’s time to venture forward once more. I appreciated hearing from those who asked about upcoming posts. Thanks in particular to the reader who reminded me that Part II of “Bored” of Directors Can Become Clash of Titans is still in the queue.
Let’s get right down to business: Dilution of founders’ and other early shareholders’ equity in startups
Academic snobs such as myself often place a lot of value on hard skills when hiring. No news here. Of course, we also look for great attitude and fit, given that so much – if not all – one conquers at the workplace nowadays is the result of collaboration and teamwork.
While most people in managerial positions agree with this approach